WW crWW crA review of Wisdom Weavers: The Lives and Thought of Harold Adam Innis and Marshall McLuhan by Tom Cooper. Connected Editions, 2025. 676 pp. Paper $37.99

In revisiting his doctoral thesis from 1979, Tom Cooper traces two academics in Wisdom Weavers: The Lives and Thought of Harold Adam Innis and Marshall McLuhan. The work of Innis and McLuhan has been written about extensively in disciplines across academia, which is a testament to their influence within and beyond communication studies. Their lives have also been written about by various biographers, placing attention to different aspects of their respective lives. In Wisdom Weavers, Cooper illustrates the ways in which their lives intersected through this part-biography, part-theoretical discussion. In the time since 1979, when the initial thesis was written about Innis and McLuhan, Cooper has continued work regarding the scholars, making this book a culmination of over forty years of scholarship.

The book consists of eleven chapters starting with biographical details of both Innis and McLuhan and ending with a look to their influence in present times. There are sections considering their early lives before scholarship, the influences that they pulled from, their eventual convergence, their respective work, and their legacies. In doing so, Cooper emphasizes the importance their work has to digital technology and communications, as well as ponders the question: “Are Innis and McLuhan right?”

After the introduction sets up Cooper’s personal connection to this work, portraits of Innis and McLuhan before their academic fame are painted. In the first chapter, “The Unknown Innis,” introduces the early life of Harold Innis, including his upbringing on a farm in Otterville, Canada. Innis is described as inquisitive with a deep connection to the natural world, which influenced the work he later would do. In the second chapter, “The Unknown McLuhan,” Cooper similarly describes the early years of Marshall McLuhan, and in doing so, grounds him as a multidimensional individual, rather than a sensationalized public persona. McLuhan’s unorthodox approaches are described, including his uncommon pattern recognition and connecting of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The two men were raised in different ways, yet similarities also drew them together. Cooper compares and contrasts the two men, articulating how their early lives and education can be seen later through their work. Throughout chapter three, “Of Canada, City, and Country,” Innis and McLuhan’s lives are interconnected through a framework of their home country of Canada. The context in which they came up is considered, including the environmental changes and technologies that were developing as they did. Innis lived and worked as a child in a small community, while McLuhan had less responsibility and moved homes eight times before he was eight years old. This consideration of their early years works as a throughline to their later work, showing that their respective identities were forged in their upbringings.

In “Of Education, English, and Economics,” the fourth chapter of the book, some of their early work is discussed. Innis and McLuhan are described as taking different approaches but heading towards a similar conclusion regarding communication studies. Their educations are discussed, between the timeline of the two World Wars, and Cooper introduces rhetoric and language as intentionally utilized in their respective works. Throughout chapter 5, “Two Men on a Collision Course,” their journeys into the study of communications are articulated, explaining their initial work as academics, and the pieces that fell into place that eventually caused the two to meet for the first time.

Chapter 6, “Toronto: The Meeting Place,” describes the relationship that existed between Innis and McLuhan, as well as biographical details including the passing of Innis in 1952. The chapter, additionally, focuses on some of the work of Innis, including his concern that communication technologies could create homogenized public opinion and upset balances in society. The chapter ultimately argues that theoretical communication studies would not exist in its current form without Innis and McLuhan.

After the passing of Innis, McLuhan continued much of his work, as is elaborated in Chapter 7, “From Innis to McLuhan.” While Innis was specific in his language, and strove for exactness, McLuhan is described as artistic and dealing in interpretations. He developed “the medium is the message” as a distillation of Innis’s work, though, through more interpretive language. Cooper describes the Toronto School of thought as never officially recognized, yet important to contributing to academia, especially regarding Innis and McLuhan. The chapter ends with an exploration of the women in both men’s lives that were often unrecognized, including the wives who both supported their work and completed their own, the women Innis and McLuhan worked with, and the women that have continued to develop their work in the years since.

The eighth chapter, “The Thought of Harold Innis,” is an exploration of his work, including analogies and dramaturgy in an effort make his work more accessible to a new audience. One of the tools Cooper utilizes to explain Innis’s work includes the Innis Man/Innis Cube. These articulate how an individual can only see the world from their cultural bias. The Innis Person exists within an Innis Cube, which is the confines from which that person can see the world. The communication mediums create bias and instability, distorting how the message may be interpreted and altering a culture’s equilibrium. Cooper also uses a dramaturgy of communication methods to outline the succession of communication tools, such as King Stone and King Papyrus through Queen Tongue and, eventually, to newer technologies such as Prince Radio. This chapter, additionally, addresses the question of whether Innis was a technological determinist, stating that he saw humans and technology as an interaction, rather than one directly causing the other.

Following an articulation of Innis’s work, the next chapter, “The Art and Thought of Marshall McLuhan,” turns the reader’s attention to the other scholar. Cooper describes how McLuhan used an artistic approach to the language he used in his writing, including a propensity for puns, similes, and humor. There is an emphasis on McLuhan’s attention to formal cause, and how he synthesized the work of others by quoting, paraphrasing, borrowing, and acting as the eponymous wisdom weaver. This chapter gives introductions and explanations of McLuhan’s most well-known concepts including the global village and hot/cool mediums. Like the Innis Man, the analogy of McLuMAN is used to consider how mediums can influence sensory perceptions. The McLuMAN sees himself through the cube, as processing of information and sensory perception is shaped by the medium being engaged with. Cooper argues that McLuhan’s work has a theoretical core, including the precepts and concepts that contribute to his understanding of communications and society.

In chapter 10, “The Legacy Lives On,” Cooper cites those that worked with Innis and McLuhan, those who have written about them in the past, and those that their work has influenced. Their legacies are explored, from McLuhan continuing Innis’s work to current work done regarding digital literacy that would have resonated with both scholars. The two impacted media and communications in considerable ways and created bridges between their work within communication studies and outside specialists and academics.

The final chapter of Wisdom Weavers, entitled “Of Bias, Balance, and Beacons,” summarizes the book, as well as looks to some futures of Innis and McLuhan’s work. Cooper coins a term, “The Innis-McLuhan effect” to describe the idea that communication technologies influence both society at large and individual sensory processes. With media and mediums having such fast life cycles, Innis’s and McLuhan’s work is more relevant than ever when technological developments can have social implications that cannot be predicted. In concluding the book, Cooper returns to a central thesis of whether Innis and McLuhan were correct; stating that they are right about human communications, if it is considered as “a play within a play.” To understand the connection between humans and communication technologies, they must be considered as an interaction. The book argues that their work was and still is important, as communication is how all other disciplines are known. It is essential to consider the mediums, contexts, and influences that drive the communication that defines knowledge.

Tom Cooper’s Wisdom Weavers adds to the work that communications scholars have developed from Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan, as well as the work of biographers who have focused their work on the two men. What sets this book apart is the focus on the interconnection between Innis and McLuhan, both in terms of their relationship and how their work weaves together throughout the field of communications and beyond. This book portrays each man as greatly considering the impact that media and communications have on the world, but as deferring to a greater universal power; religion for McLuhan, and nature/geography for Innis. They are defined as somewhat deterministic but acknowledging something larger that controls everything.

This is an ambitious book, in that it covers many different aspects of Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan, and at moments the scope can be unruly for a reader as it covers their biographical lives, their work, and their legacies. Cooper employs many tools for understanding complex concepts which is important for readers being introduced to both scholars, though the extensive detail and scope may make it somewhat less accessible to a new audience. With so much information, however, there is much that can be gleaned, and as such, the book could be a useful reference tool. What stands out from reading is Cooper’s clear passion and connection to the subjects, as well as his developments on their research. “The Innis-McLuhan effect” is an intriguing contribution when thinking of the interaction between humans and technologies that has potential for further development and application. In its extensive scope, Wisdom Weavers adds much to the landscapes of Innis/McLuhan biographies, primers of their academic work, while developing on their ideas.

 

Morgan Stone is a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin